More than that, though, this passage helps see the depth to which Jig relies on the man. The discussion about whether to go through with the abortion reveals underlying fissures in their relationship that they refuse to openly acknowledge.
Nilofer Hashmi considers the last line of the story to be a concession to the man. Compare this narrative technique to the traditional nineteenth-century method of telling a story. At this point, Jig acknowledges a flaw in their relationship.
The man appears agitated and sarcastic, compared to the pleasant and innocent Jig. Had Hemingway said that the girl, for example, spoke "sarcastically," or "bitterly," or "angrily," or that she was "puzzled" or "indifferent," or if we were told that the man spoke with "an air of superiority," we could more easily come to terms with these characters.
While Jig desires to please the man, she feels so strongly about not having the abortion that she subtly suggests keeping the child once more. Since the pregnancy, she has felt things change between her and the man. Their luggage has "labels on them from all the hotels where they had spent nights.
After walking away from the conversation, Jig sees a picturesque landscape scene and begins talking about the future. And to answer this question, we must make note of one of the few details in the story: In this exchange Critical essay hills like white elephant dialogue, the man and Jig refer to their ideal lives in two different ways.
At the end of their conversation, she takes control of herself and of the situation: With or without the abortion, things will never be the same. Jig is trying to convince herself that she is unimportant — that her thoughts, feelings, and desires, do not matter in order to sustain this relationship.
This is the first point in the story where the incompatibility and personality differences are clearly exemplified through dialogue.
The tension remains, coiled and tight, as they prepare to leave for Madrid. Furthermore, the man imposes his perception on the relationship as the correct perception when discussing abortion with Jig, silencing her voice in the matter.
He presents only the conversation between them and allows his readers to draw their own conclusions. On the other hand, we feel that the girl is not at all sure that she wants an abortion. It is a wonder that this story was published at all.
Then, such authors as Dickens or Trollope would often address their readers directly. It can be inferred that Jig wants the man to enjoy her witty remarks like he would have before the pregnancy. He is a drunk who has just tried to kill himself.
This insight is best illustrated when she looks across the river and sees fields of fertile grain and the river — the fertility of the land, contrasted to the barren sterility of the hills like white elephants. Could we have another beer?
I disagree with that analysis based off of the previous dialogue where Jig attempts to end the conversation. She makes one last effort to convince the man that keeping the child is plausible scenario. This is another example of a disconnection in the conversation and the relationship.
You know I love you. The man has reduced the problems in the relationship to Jig being pregnant; that reduction inaccurately portrays how Jig feels. Jig and the man are unable to openly discuss major issues in their relationship. Their life of transience, of instability, is described by the girl as living on the surface: When he asks her to stop teasing, Jig tries to calm him by reminding him that she was just joking.
Given their seemingly free style of living and their relish for freedom, a baby and a marriage would impose great changes in their lives.
She tosses out a conversational, fanciful figure of speech — noting that the hills beyond the train station "look like white elephants" — hoping that the figure of speech will please the man, but he resents her ploy. At the time, editors tried to second-guess what the reading public wanted, and, first, they felt as though they had to buy stories that told stories, that had plots.
Jig avoids any confrontation by changing the topic showing that she accepts or has learned to accept the man belittling her.Get ready to write your paper on "Hills Like White Elephants" with our suggested essay topics, sample essays, and more. How to Write Literary Analysis How to.
The short story “Hills Like White Elephants,” by Ernest Hemingway, is about a young couple and the polemic issue of abortion.
However, since the word “abortion is found nowhere is the story, it is mainly understood through Hemingway’s use of literacy elements: setting and imagery/symbolism. Ernest Hemingway's "Hills Like White Elephants," tells the story of a man and a woman drinking beer and anise liqueur while they wait at a train station in Spain.
The man is attempting to convince the woman to get an abortion, but the woman is ambivalent about it. The story takes its tension from. This literature review demonstrates my ability to create a well-supported opinion of a short story through a critical analysis of the piece.
Hemingway’s Dialogue: Building and Revealing Relationships in “Hills Like White Elephants” Hemingway’s use of dialogue in “Hills Like White Elephants” establishes the relationship between the man and the “girl”.
Essays and criticism on Ernest Hemingway's Hills Like White Elephants - Essays and Criticism.
In Ernest Hemingway's story "Hills Like White Elephants," what is a "white elephant"? 1 educator answer What solution can be suggested .Download